This essay argues for a model of pictorial representation which aims to explain the relationship between pictorial content and pictorial accuracy. Through close examination of a series of cases, I argue that each component of this model is essential in order to make sense of pictorial accuracy across a range of cases. ![]() I call this the Three-Part Model, because it distinguishes between a triad of factors- singular content, attributive content, and target- which together determine pictorial accuracy. For a picture to be accurate, both aspects must be matched in the target. In addition, content is thought to divide into two aspects: singular content specifies the particular individuals which a picture is of, and attributive content specifies the properties and relations which the picture ascribes to those individuals. Such a picture is accurate when the content it expresses fits the target scene it aims at. Focusing on cases where pictures are intended to convey accurate information, the theory distinguishes between two fundamental representational relations: on one hand, a picture expresses a content on the other, it aims at a target scene. This paper argues for a theory of pictorial accuracy, with attention to the relationship between accuracy and pictorial content. For We Really See Two Different Facts.Truth, or accuracy, is widely thought to be the centerpiece of any formal theory of meaning, at least in the study of language. This No Doubt Also Explains Why There Are Two Possible Ways of Seeing the Figure as a Cube and All Similar Phenomena. Susanne Kriemann Reading 5.5423: To Perceive a Complex Means to Perceive That Its Constituents Are Related to One Another in Such and Such Way.It Must Set Limits to What Cannot Be Thought by Working Outwards Through What Can Be Thought, 2015, printed 2019 Moyra Davey Reading 4.114: It Must Set Limits to What Can Be Thought And, in Doing So, to What Cannot Be Thought.Lisa Tan Reading 2.223: In Order to Tell Whether the Picture Is True or False We Must Compare It With Reality, 2018, printed 2019.Logic Is Transcendental, 2018, printed 2019 Viktoria Binschtok Reading 6.13: Logic Is Not a Body of Doctrine, but a Mirror-Image of the World.Tatiana Krongberg Reading 5.511: How Can Logic-All-Embracing Logic, Which Mirrors the World-Use Such Peculiar Crotchets and Contrivances? Only Because They Are All Connected With One Another in an Infinitely Fine Network, the Great Mirror, 2018, printed 2019.Luisa Lambri Reading 5.63: I Am My World.Amir Zaki Reading 2.161: There Must Be Something Identical in a Picture and What It Depicts, to Enable the One to Be a Picture of the Otherat All., 2018, printed 2019.Without Having Had Its Sense Explained to Me., 2019 Pradeep Dalal Reading 4.021: A Proposition Is a Picture of Reality: for it I Understand a Proposition, I Know the Situation It Represents.Nigel Shafran Reading 6.44: It Is Not How Things Are in the World, 2017, printed 2019.Propositions Can Only Say How Things Are, Not What They Are., 2019 I Can Only Speak About Them: I Cannot Put Them Into Words. Lucas Blalock Reading 3.221: Objects Can Only Be Named.Leslie Hewitt Reading 2.1511: That Is How a Picture Is Attached to Reality: It Reaches Right Out to It, 2019. ![]() Barbara Kasten Reading 4.1212: What Can Be Shown, Cannot Be Said, 2016, printed 2019. ![]() Information about image downloads and licensing is available here. To help improve this record, please email. ![]() Object information is a work in progress and may be updated as new research findings emerge. Made 2016 Medium Gelatin silver print Edition 2 of 5 Dimensions Paper: 20.4 × 25.4 cm (8 × 10 in.) Credit Line Gift of Ralph and Nancy Segall Reference Number 2021.586.3 Extended information about this artwork Dates may be represented as a range that spans decades, centuries, dynasties, or periods and may include qualifiers such as c. Dateĭates are not always precisely known, but the Art Institute strives to present this information as consistently and legibly as possible. Let Us Called This Connexion on Its Elements the Structure of the Picture, and Let Us Call the Possibility of This Structure the Pictorial Form of the Picture. About this artwork Status Currently Off View Department Photography and Media Artist Arthur Ou Title Barbara Probst reading 2.15: The Fact That the Elements of a Picture Are Related to One ANother in a Determinate Way Represents That Things Are Related to One Another in the Same Way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |